Good morning, Quartz readers!
July 1 marks a 17th anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover from Britain to China, and this weekend activists are gearing adult for annual anti-China protests of record size. In new weeks, Beijing has delirious concerns that a “one country, dual systems” model, that guaranteed Hong Kong a high grade of domestic leisure and authorised it to thrive, could be rolled back.
China’s executive government effectively disemboweled the long-held oath that Hong Kong was “highly autonomous” in a open request progressing this month. Communist Party spokesman newspapers have mocked a new polite referendum on voting in Hong Kong. Meanwhile hacking attacks believed to come from China and undisguised vigour from Beijing threaten giveaway debate in a city.
But this comes as Hong Kong wonders about some-more than usually a domestic future. Other fast-growing financial hubs are snatching business from a city of 7 million that exists mostly given of finance. New York has spin Chinese tech firms’ go-to IPO spot; London has desirous skeleton to be a world’s renminbi trade hub; and Singapore is hidden private banking business.
Hong Kongers, who honour themselves on operative hard, following a manners and staying out of any others’ business, are perplexing to find answers to some tough questions: How can a city change to catch vigour from Beijing, though sojourn livable? How can its financial markets scratch behind business? How can it reinvent itself to equivocate apropos zero some-more than a hulk selling mall?
The regard over Beijing’s change is already sketch doubtful groups to a streets. On Friday, hundreds of Hong Kong’s lawyers took to a streets, for usually a time given a 1997 handover. How many people spin out for the July 1 protests, and how China responds, should be closely-watched by a rest of a world. It will be a exam of solve for both Hong Kongers and for Beijing.—Heather Timmons
Five things on Quartz we generally liked
Silicon Valley’s farrago problem. The tech star claims to be a ultimate meritocracy though a enlightenment is so uniform that it’s more like an chosen club, argues Carlos Bueno, a program engineer. Max Nisen breaks out new information from a Valley’s tech giants confirming that both their leaders and engineers are especially white and Asian men.
Sitting is bad for you. No, really, unequivocally bad. Hannah Newman delves into a scholarship of sitting and explains since it’s so damaging that even practice doesn’t mitigate the heightened risks of cancer, heart illness and other ills. Luckily, there’s an easy solution: Sit less. (We’re now meditative about putting station desks in a Quartz office.)
A indication and her murderer—both mercantile migrants. Diana O’Brien, a Canadian model, changed to Shanghai in 2008. Two weeks later Chen Jun, a immature Chinese migrant laborer, murdered her. Gwynn Guilford looks into a mercantile resources that done both of them “cheap, exploitable, and eventually fungible labor” in a city.
The economics of business class. The run from New York’s JFK airfield to Los Angeles LAX is one of a many highly-trafficked flights in a US—and also a many lucrative. David Yanofsky analyzes why it’s such a money-spinner and other airlines have bulked adult their business-class offerings.
The genuine problem with tyro debt. Those Americans who get many deeply in pawn as students tend to also go on to good careers and compensate it off. And they’re a ones who make a stink about tyro debt. But, Matt Phillips writes, a genuine problem is those who shelve adult a some-more medium volume though don’t get a degree.
Five things elsewhere that done us smarter
A story of a barcode. Thisweek saw a 40th anniversary of a initial sell product to be scanned—a container of Wrigley’s gum. A 2009 essay by Tony Seideman traces a technological expansion that had to take place before an invention law in 1949 could spin so ubiquitous that a complicated star literally wouldn’t run though it.
What if we’re a unequivocally large accident? The Fermi Paradox says: If a star is so vast, since are we apparently alone? The scholarship blog Wait But Why unpacks all a mind-boggling probable implications. One of these is that a expansion of intelligent life is just fantastically improbable; Zach Zorich during Nautilus looks during a latest investigate on what would occur if we could rewind the fasten and let evolution run again.
Should a first lady be sexy? The US’s Michelle Obama appears on repository covers as wholesome, maternal and business-like. But in a new cover shoot, Mexico’s Angelica Rivera de Peña was swashbuckling, smouldering, and sexual. Robin Ghivan in a Washington Post picks detached a complex aesthetics of where femininity meets power.
Visions of a drudge economy. We’ll confess we haven’t nonetheless review all of this 138-page e-book from British “innovation foundation” Nesta, though it’s by a good set of essays by various economists and technologists on how to consider about what the next few decades of automation will do we to your pursuit and your world.
Why Disney’s Frozen has been a worldwide success. What creates this cartoon about a princess so many some-more popular than any series of other cartoons about princesses? Maria Konnikova in a New Yorker reports on a formula of research suggesting that it’s given the main character is flawed and a film subverts a formulae that have always worked in a past.
Our best wishes for a relaxing though thought-filled weekend. Please send any news, comments, initial lady cover shoots and vintage barcodes to firstname.lastname@example.org. You can follow us on Twitter here for updates via a day.